sociallyengineering.com Blog » raison d’etre

as american as…

demiourgos — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:11:17 +0000

remember the good old days when the reason for killing someone involved something important like cheerleading and not a virtual personal ostracization? an good old a fashioned what the fuck to ‘defriending’…

all the lonely people…

demiourgos — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:03:30 +0000

imagine the depths of solitude one must experience to resort to a lonely appeal to a camera in search of something to lend an ear…er rather lens to their troubles.

watch your shit fall like rome…

demiourgos — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:55:35 +0000

it’s a bird…not it’s a plane…it’s super congress! able to stop freedom in a single bound! the finances of the country reflect a banana republic so why shouldn’t the government as well?

a military industrial
illusion of democracy

some insects called the human race…

demiourgos — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:08:40 +0000

“i’d like to share a revelation that i’ve had during my time here. it came to me when i tried to classify your species, and i realised that humans are not actually mammals. every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment; but you humans do not. instead you multiply, and multiply, until every resource is consumed. the only way for you to survive is to spread to another area. there is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern… a virus.”

an entertaining pleasantry, eh? mercifully just a bit of fanciful fictional posturing…right?

i’m king of the world!

demiourgos — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:31:19 +0000

a james cameron movie is in it’s essence a porno: nothing but a fantastic look, unrealistic action and the thinnest of plots to get to the money shot.

whatever happened to baby jane?

demiourgos — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:44:30 +0000

finally it has been said aloud was has been apparent for years by an authority of the body no less, one of chicago’s finest, roger ebert:

” i am happy to say it brings back an element sadly missing in recent movies, gratuitous nudity. sexy women would ‘happen’ to be topless in the 1970s movies for no better reason than that everyone agreed, including themselves, that their breasts were a genuine pleasure to regard — the most beautiful naturally occurring shapes in nature, i believe. now we see breasts only in serious films, for expressing reasons.”

clearly a man with a preference and only the question remains to be answered:

“what-a good is all the violence in the world unless
it is toppled with limitless sex?”

mom met dad in the back of a rock and roll car…

demiourgos — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:28:13 +0000

after all is said and done, a final request remains to be completed, a task to finish off what has been started, the coupe de grace to the day and a simple entreaty to make it all worthwhile:

“put your fingers up my ass, are you deaf?”

i’ve got the cure you’re thinkin’ of…

demiourgos — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:12:13 +0000

while novel in it’s label, the notion of a “death panel” is hardly the concept du jour the extreme would have you believe. for years now the american medical industrial complex has operated quite successfully a variety of death panels offering a multitude of denied claims and final solutions under the palatable moniker “health maintenance organization”, more commonly referred to as an “H.M.O.”

chopper, sic balls!

demiourgos — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:40:46 +0000

of the fields of human mastery, martial prowess, sexual prowess, political acumen, superior intelligence, unrivaled beauty, exists the farce of human artistry known as being a hipster. me as art is as vacant as what is considered art, a histronic endeavor to aggrandize what is not noteworthy. there is no irony, creation or stimulation, just the sad comment that retro, urban or chic is a coked out, fucked out, played out notion of recycling the same ol’ incestous impulses that never really challenged nor provided any definition save that one is a burned out husk of a paper doll with a mentally challenged sense of conformity.

no thanks hollywood, i ain’t in to that…

demiourgos — Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:50:31 +0000

is not the term “movie” an antiquated and witless relic of a less kinetic time? what of substance can be said of the annual gladiatorial game of motion picture performance colloquially known as the oscars? nothing, for that which lacks substance cannot be accounted for with substance any more than art can compete. nonetheless why has any pat on the back taken on such an ostentatious and overblown countenance when the knife in the back has so much more staying power to affect change? what can be said about a change agent if its success must be taken notice of? perhaps the change is not so significant, if at all, and hardly worth the recognition.